The Hammer Without a Master
(Economics with a hammer)
(and a grateful nod to the New York Times Editorial Page)
Sure enough, last week Morgan Stanley
explained its quarterly loss by saying
that some of its traders were still “gun shy”
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
Sure enough, last week Morgan Stanley
explained its quarterly loss by saying
that some of its traders were still “gun shy”
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
Sure enough, last week Morgan Stanley
explained its quarterly loss by saying
that some of its traders were still “gun shy”
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
that some of its traders were still “gun shy”
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
still “gun shy” after
“gun shy” after
“gun shy” after
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
after last year’s near-death experience in the financial markets,
last year’s near-death
last year’s near-death
last year’s near-death
experience
year’s near-death experience in the
year’s near-death experience in the
year’s near-death experience in the
financial markets.
but
that the firm now planned to increase its risk taking.
that the firm now planned to increase its risk taking.
that the firm now planned to increase its risk taking.
that the firm now planned to increase its risk taking.
firm now planned
to increase its risk taking.
increase its
risk taking.
To try to stay competitive with Goldman and other banks,
Morgan Stanley has also allocated a big chunk of its net revenue for compensation.
a big chunk of its net revenue for compensation.
a big chunk of its net revenue for compensation.
of its net revenue
for compensation.
Posts of Special Interest:
Monday, July 27, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment