Caught in the trap of life, man is moved by a field of attraction determined by a flash point where solid forms are destroyed, where the various objects that constitute the world are consumed as in a furnace of light. -- Georges BatailleI've been thinking about the good Reverend Earwhigger's emphasis on the consumer as key to solving the present crisis (see previous post) -- but I've come up with a solution very different from what he's proposed. (He shouldn't feel badly, however. He was my inspiration!)
It seems to me that what we need from the consumer is not a boycott (see previous post), but the exact opposite, i.e. exactly what the Gods of Capitalism created the consumer to achieve: consumption. Mass consumption. The consumption of mass quantities. In other words (the words of Bataille): Expenditure Without Reserve!
Did you watch 60 Minutes recently? I'm thinking of the segment hosted by the ever-lovely, ever wise Lesley Stahl, the one on truffles. Did you know that a single meal featuring truffles in a top French restaurant can cost $1,000 or more? So why not go for it? Grab that credit card, hop a flight to Paris, preferably First Class, make your dinner reservation, enjoy your meal, and be sure to spend the rest of your stay in a first class hotel.
Why, you say? Well, let's face it, the world economy is due for a total collapse, but the powers that be are doing everything in their power to delay the inevitable. Meanwhile, since the only arrow in their quivering quiver is spelled "austerity," it seems that their solution is to squeeze every last drop of blood from the 99% in order to protect the vast wealth of the 1%. If things continue along such lines for very much longer (and it looks like they will), then all us ordinary folk, workers, middle class, professionals, ne'er do wells, always do wells, under achievers, over achievers, college grads (with huge debt loads) and high school dropouts (with huge families) alike, will be forced into bankruptcy -- or worse (if you've racked up student debts they won't let you go bankrupt, you'll become their slave).
The longer they kick the can down the road to preserve the "economy" for the banks and the super-rich, the worse it's going to get for the rest of us. So what is needed, if we want to survive, is some strategy to force their hand, i.e., to bring the whole absurd mess down around their necks, Sampson style, as soon as humanly possible. Only then will the spell of the Plutogarchs be broken; only then will society be free to pick up the pieces, recognizing that what is important is not money, but resources, both natural and human, managed by true representatives of the people, not the super-wealthy and their minions, whose wealth will have evaporated into thin air once the money mirage concocted exclusively for their own benefit and at our expense has lifted.
So, who will be our Sampson? In some past posts, I've nominated the workers, and I still think a united international movement of organized workers, aided and abetted by sympathizers among the middle class, professionals, students, etc., could achieve a great deal. However, the Reverend H.C. Earwhigger ridiculed that idea as hopelessly outdated and perhaps he's right. For him, it is the consumer who is all powerful. And I have to admit that on reflection there is definitely some truth in that. But a consumer boycott won't work, because for one thing consumption is already down and for another, consumer boycotts are effective only when very precisely targeted, which means they can only have a very limited effect.
Nevertheless, there IS something we consumers can do to trash the "economy" and I'm not sure why I never thought of that before. What has brought our financial system to the brink of disaster has been reckless borrowing. And because we borrowed so much we are now very cautious about how much we spend and are reluctant to borrow much more. Nevertheless, because the powers that be are now in panic mode and not thinking straight, it is now actually almost as easy to borrow today as it ever was. Just check out those automobile commercials. No money down, easy terms, easy credit no problem. Same with mortgages, which are now selling for the lowest interest rates in history. Same with credit card debt, student debt, etc.
So, we now have it within our power to resume the same destructive process that blew the last bubble, only this time, if we really gird our loins and try, we can blow the damned thing up literally to kingdom come. It will, of course, take organization. Don't try this at home folks, until you're sure you won't be alone. It will require the mobilization of consumers on a vast scale, for sure, in every corner of the world where credit is easily available (in other words, just about everywhere).
Once we are organized, then hold onto your hats. We'll start buying everything in sight, en masse. Need a new car? Why settle for a Ford or Chevy when you can buy an Audi, BMW, or better yet, a Mercedes or Cadillac? Already own a house? Why not buy a summer place, preferably in the Hamptons? Think you can't get the loan? Well think again. The "market," especially the housing market, but also the automobile market, is as starved for attention as a teen age delinquent. Get out that credit card and if that isn't enough, head for your local bank. If they turn you down, try another, I can almost guarantee you'll find some bank eager to loan you just about whatever you want.
Students, don't be shy. Step right up to that admissions office and sign yourself up for the biggest student loan you can get, preferably for the full four years, and at the most expensive Ivy League school that will take you. They'll be down on their knees with gratitude, because a great many of these hallowed institutions are now in deep deep trouble.
If millions of us go on a spree all at once, all at the same time, borrowing to the hilt and buying whatever we damn please, spending like crazy and without reserve, we can send that bubble soaring into the stratosphere. All it will take will be a tiny pea from the tiniest pea shooter you can imagine to bring it down. And all the King's horses and all the King's men will NOT be able to put that damned phoney baloney "economy" together again.
Amen!
Oh, sure, Doc G, you're right: overfeeding the system could be just as much a corrective as starving it. But why go into debt to do it?
ReplyDeleteThe method would be to buy, buy, buy – as you say – but have everything you buy sent as a gift – to your credit card company.
So, for example, you would buy six KIA SUV's or 1000 cartons of Pampers or a diamond brooch from Cartier and have them all sent to your credit company, along with an enclosed card stating that the cost of the items should be credited toward your next credit card statement. I guess, just to prove you are not being unreasonable, you should make sure that the items may be returned for credit within thirty days.
You've helped correct the economy ("correction" as might be defined by a dominatrix) at no cost to yourself.
Whether the goods are returned or not – and they probably would not be, considering the cumbrousness of these huge corporations – you will have managed to throw the system into disarray. And – either way – you have a foolproof defense when the collection agencies begin to call. Just don't lose your paperwork.
You might even make a little money if, foresightedly, you bought some stock in UPS and FedEx.
FYI:
Discover Card International, 2500 Lake Cook Road Riverwoods, IL 60015
Visa Financial Services 595 Market St., San Francisco, CA 94104;
Mastercard, 2000 Purchase St., Purchase, NY 10577
American Express, 200 Vesey St., New York, NY, 10285
Your old pal,
Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd
Yes, Reverend, you have an excellent point. Borrow to the hilt from the banks and send it all back to them as a gift. LOL!!!! Stuff it down their throats. I love it!
ReplyDeleteBut honestly I'd prefer to keep all that loot to myself. That's what I'D call financial innovation! :-)
I'm not sure any of the USA's inequality problems (which are the source of ALL problems) let alone the world's, is ever going to be solved by worldwide methods or ideas or banks or national parties. Organization of "workers" is ridiculous considering the difference between such workers worldwide. Not to mention cultural and historical differences. Half the working world (in 2012) still lives in total poverty. Half of those live in authoritarian regimes which would easily crush any such movements. I think the only movement against the obscenly wealthy and the rest of us, is to hammer home that message to all and anyone we know or meet. The message that all of us need to stop "settling" for the lessor(s) of two (or more) evils.
ReplyDeleteEvery country experiencing turmoil now, is struggling with this concept. And it's so old. That is, are these people in power really one's "friends," concerned in the least with our welfare? Or are they only historically passing fads of politics?
Especially so in the USA. The fact that Americans, based on polls, are almost equally divided between Obama and Romney, I find very disconcerting. But such total asshole candidates have won in the past. For the next few months at least, I think our main hope is that Obama turns out in his second term, much less of an asshole than he gave us in his first.
Thanks for this very thoughtful post. I still think an international worker's movement is our best, if not our only, hope. The cultural and historical differences you mention are rapidly dissolving, especially among the young, who share a great many things, including computers, cell phones, Internet access. The authoritative regimes you mention would lose their hold over their militaries after a worldwide financial collapse and many in these militaries might well side with the workers, who are after all their own parents, brothers and sisters.
DeleteIt wouldn't be easy. It would be a real struggle. (Was it Hegel or Marx who said that all life is struggle?) But the more desperate things become for working people the clearer the call to action will be. The good news is that the worldwide coup could be bloodless if preceded by financial collapse, which would totally undermine the power of the oligarchs.
It's difficult to foresee the future. Who could have foreseen the anti-Vietnam movement, for example? Or Occupy Wall St.
As far as Obama is concerned, if he is re-elected then hopefully he won't be so much under the thumb of the big money people, so maybe there would be some hope. If Romney is elected, then the US could become a fascist country I'm afraid, since he'd have no choice but to cater to the extreme right wing. So regardless of how disenchanted with Obama we might be, there's really no choice.
Docg, I'd be interested in a new, long post from you, perhaps a new article?, PREDICTING what the following 4 years after the election could be or realistically look like, in two parts. What might we expect if Romney/Ryan beats out Obama? Or if Obama/Biden beats the liars/hypocrits?
ReplyDeleteHow about a nice, new, freshly polished major post from you?
My own view and prediction is that after all is said and done, after the election, Obama will have won by 3-5 percent and about 50-60 extra electoral votes. Anyway, hope so.
I'm no Obama fan, but Romney and especially this psycho Ryan, scare me. For all the problems I have with Obama, the alternative is truly something I don't really want to ponder. Eeegodz...
Is this a dead web blog? There has been nothing new on here for half a year it seems, so should I delete this site's bookmark on my Mac???
ReplyDeleteI still monitor this blog for comments, and every once in a while I'm inspired to add a new post, but for the most part I feel I've said more or less everything I really want to say on the economy. Or to put it another way, whatever I might want to say is already being said now by others, which is actually a good thing. Thanks for checking in and nudging me, though.
Deleteok nice work DocG keep it up your blog is good i also see it, Keep It Up......!
ReplyDelete